From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Jul 24 20:12:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C3237B931 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:12:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@luna.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from luna.osd.bsdi.com (postfix@pdx10-3-62.transport.com [209.222.174.190]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA61034; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by luna.osd.bsdi.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A7D931A6; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:12:38 -0700 From: Jim Mock To: Udo Erdelhoff Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Foo Message-ID: <20000724201238.A20390@luna.osd.bsdi.com> Reply-To: jim@luna.osd.bsdi.com References: <20000725001225.V66732@nathan.ruhr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.5i In-Reply-To: <20000725001225.V66732@nathan.ruhr.de>; from ue@nathan.ruhr.de on Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 12:12:25AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 at 00:12:25 +0200, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > Hi, > while poking around the doc dir, I've found a couple instances > articles that use to close the current in-line element. Jade > accepts these constructso they're obviously not illegal. On the other, > I don't think they're good style, either. It's valid DocBook, IIRC, so that's why it doesn't complain about them, but I do agree with you on the style point though. > Fixing them should be rather easy. Opinions? I've been changing the ones I've come across -- I think changing them is a good thing. - jim -- /* jim mock - berkeley software design, inc - open source division */ /* documentation manager - jim@FreeBSD.org - jim@luna.osd.bsdi.com */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message