Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:49:56 +0100 From: John Murphy <jfm@blueyonder.co.uk> To: Khalil.Haddad@ubs.com Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP Nat or NATd Message-ID: <mjkoktset38dpphgtb6kdbfjea03nmjutr@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <H0000152004f0651.0994839931.ps3p84.par.swissbank.com@MHS> References: <H0000152004f0651.0994839931.ps3p84.par.swissbank.com@MHS>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Khalil.Haddad@ubs.com wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I have a ppp xDSL connection. I am currently using the internal ppp NAT=20
>to manage my internat network. For now this system is working as a=20
>charm.
>
>I would like to ask you wether I should use NATd ?
>
>I am asking myself this because I might in a near future need more NAT=20
>functions like port redirecting etc ...
ppp nat does port redirection. From man 8 ppp
nat port proto targetIP:targetPort[-targetPort] aliasPort[-aliasPort]
[remoteIP:remotePort[-remotePort]]
This command causes incoming proto connections to aliasPort to be
redirected to targetPort on targetIP. proto is either ``tcp'' or =
``udp''.
>And I am also curious of what you all think about ppp nat vs. NATd.
I find the set filter alive and set filter dial features very useful
for dial up modems.
John.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?mjkoktset38dpphgtb6kdbfjea03nmjutr>