From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Feb  5 13:23:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from urban.iinet.net.au (urban.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.231])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9315D37B67D; Mon,  5 Feb 2001 13:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from muzak.iinet.net.au (muzak.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.237])
	by urban.iinet.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA04086;
	Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:23:21 +0800
Received: from elischer.org (reggae-14-42.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.77.42])
	by muzak.iinet.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA19324;
	Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:20:54 +0800
Message-ID: <3A7F0B95.35887B1D@elischer.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:22:45 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386)
X-Accept-Language: en, hu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrick Bihan-Faou <patrick@netzuno.com>
Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG,
	richw@webcom.com, julian@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP? (more info)
References: <HJEEKLMFLKEOKHOKNPBMAEBICKAA.patrick@netzuno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> 
> Ah!
> 
> Yep this seems to be fixing my problem here. I actually reimplemented
> Julian's patch on a test system here, but luckily did not get confused by
> the order of the test (the first test should be if(do_bridge || ...) rather
> than if (!do_bridge)).
> 
> To Julian's defence, the use of a #ifdef BRIDGE in one place and $ifndef
> BRIDGE in the other place was confusing though.

no, the problem is that I didn't test the 'obvious' case because it
 was 'obvious' (and wrong)

> 
> Patrick.

reimplememted?

-- 
      __--_|\  Julian Elischer
     /       \ julian@elischer.org
    (   OZ    ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/  
            v


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message