Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Mar 1997 19:28:52 -0800
From:      John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To:        terry@lambert.org
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A new Kernel Module System
Message-ID:  <199704010328.TAA25551@austin.polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <199703312059.NAA10110@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References:  <199703312059.NAA10110@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199703312059.NAA10110@phaeton.artisoft.com>,
Terry Lambert  <terry@lambert.org> wrote:
> I've felt for a long time now that the intent of the memory hole
> at the start of the executable in the ELF SVR4 EABI was to allow
> the mapping of the ld.so into the process address space without
> there being code in crt0.o to actually do the work.

That is exactly the case in SVR4.  The kernel maps the combined libc+ld.so
into the hole before execution begins.
--
   John Polstra                                       jdp@polstra.com
   John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                Seattle, Washington USA
   "Self-knowledge is always bad news."                 -- John Barth



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704010328.TAA25551>