From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 15:42:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C5C106566B for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB79D8FC18 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P8ang-0008xH-3P; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:42:00 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P8ang-000F9e-2N; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:42:00 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:42:00 +0100 Message-Id: To: to.my.trociny@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <86ocavxlho.fsf@kopusha.home.net> From: Pete French Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd@jdc.parodius.com Subject: Re: Has anyone usd hast in production yet - opinions ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:42:03 -0000 > Being the author of many problem reports I can say that most of them were not > critical and for marginal cases (like some issues with hooks or a race that > showed up when changing HAST role in loop -- you would never do this in > production). And fixes were committed in several days after a report. I don't > know any open issue. Ah, thanks for this. I have just updated everything to the latest -STABLE, and am thinking of shifting to hast sometime next week. cheers, -pete.