Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:59:47 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: camcontrol rescan all fails if there is no bus 0 Message-ID: <4CCE6563.1090808@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20101031202915.GA23291@sandvine.com> References: <AANLkTiksEn2DP7Y=x=u99qcf28bBEspOWRnsWUfhaOPg@mail.gmail.com> <E4EB1292-C4F8-4385-8ACD-58BE792988F1@samsco.org> <20101026160457.GA61133@sandvine.com> <9EC3B874-B089-4ED4-9A12-FA7A0E170A7B@samsco.org> <20101031141031.GA14661@sandvine.com> <4CCDC08E.7020506@icyb.net.ua> <20101031202915.GA23291@sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 31/10/2010 22:29 Ed Maste said the following: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 09:16:30PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> Can you test a synthetic situation where you have e.g. bus 1, but no >> bus 0 ? E.g. by having two umass devices connected during boot and >> then removing one of them. > > Yes, good idea - stock camcontrol: > > [root@edlaptop ~]# camcontrol rescan all > camcontrol: CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl failed: Invalid argument > > With the patch: > > [root@edlaptop ~]# ./camcontrol rescan all > Re-scan of bus 1 was successful Cool! Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CCE6563.1090808>