Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:11:23 -0600 (MDT) From: "Ryan Sommers" <ryans@gamersimpact.com> To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: trap 12 with preempt (and ule) Message-ID: <53526.208.4.77.15.1098213083.squirrel@208.4.77.15> In-Reply-To: <16757.25445.575976.716018@ran.psg.com> References: <16756.47081.304613.940742@ran.psg.com> <20041019134037.GC1072@green.homeunix.org> <16757.16950.231007.263153@ran.psg.com> <20041019165417.GE1072@green.homeunix.org> <16757.18685.756183.845077@ran.psg.com> <20041019172426.GF1072@green.homeunix.org> <53475.208.4.77.15.1098212379.squirrel@208.4.77.15> <16757.25445.575976.716018@ran.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randy Bush said: >> I wouldn't say ULE is completely instable. > > no, it seems stable on three systems here. i does seem > very ill-advised to combine it with preemption. and > bsd4 seems compatible with preemption. This is true. I don't use preemption and the mailserver is from before preemption was added to CURRENT I think. -- Ryan Sommers ryans@gamersimpact.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53526.208.4.77.15.1098213083.squirrel>