Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 19:50:11 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Volker Stolz <vs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: USE_QT_VER after including bsd.port.pre.mk? Message-ID: <200405031950.13007.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <409673D8.6080807@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040503122023.GF27940@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <200405031820.55622.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <409673D8.6080807@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 03 May 2004 18:31, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Monday 03 May 2004 17:51, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>On Monday 03 May 2004 17:43, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>>Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>>>So why was portlint changed prematurely? Surely confusing port > >>>>maintainers serves no purpose? > >>> > >>>It wasn't changed prematurely. You have to specify USE_QT_VER *before* > >>>including bsd.port.pre.mk, using OPTIONS or not. > >> > >>No, you don't. I've been sucessfully using USE_QT_VER in > >> security/pinentry *after* <bsd.port.pre.mk> for a long time. > > > > ...at least this _used_ to work when I made the port, it doesn't anymore. > > :-/ > > <http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk#rev1.365>; *sigh* *fetches the pointy hat* Fun stuff nobody ever complained (except arved@ on IRC, heh). I'm going to turn pinentry into a masterport with slaves for the individual pinentry-s. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405031950.13007.michaelnottebrock>