From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 18:43:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B2616A41F for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kei-29ij@myamail.com) Received: from bkp.bsdhost.net (bkp.bsdhost.net [66.160.134.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB01643D48 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kei-29ij@myamail.com) Received: from c-24-147-173-140.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.173.140] helo=[172.16.2.95]) by bkp.bsdhost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1EKodH-000INp-8C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:58:51 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: <44psqtyro2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <4464smhav9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <7C079D45-1A89-4795-A6B0-586CB8D28BF6@myamail.com> <44u0g5dwd5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44psqtyro2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: FC Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:43:51 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Subject: Re: Mounting NetBSD disk under FreeBSD. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:43:54 -0000 On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > *** > This message was sent to your KasMail disposable email address: > FC kei-29ij@myamail.com > *** > > FC writes: > > >> I thinks it is a shame that all the BSD OS can get together and have >> something consistent through all the platforms. ext2fs can be mounted >> on all the Linux flavors. >> > > You do realize that your problem had nothing to do with filesystem > format, right? As your solution showed, both OS *do* understand UFS. Yes, I understand that. The only think I am saying is kind of little detail give a bad customer/user experience and it can be easily avoided. I don't mind snorkeling around in the OS, but this came at some point which I ad no time to loose and I spend almost two day trying to figure out why this disk would not be mounted. I'm not accusing FreeBSD nor NetBSD people. I just think, that's sad. Anyway, I finally got what I wanted and thanks for your patience and your help. -fred-