Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:24:09 +0100 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: Bernhard Froehlich <decke@freebsd.org> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future direction of virtualbox-ose port on FreeBSD Message-ID: <3095B667-A2DD-40A6-95FE-0A59DEF853CF@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <bf0bde98729c30ff9b3dedc121049354@bluelife.at> References: <bf0bde98729c30ff9b3dedc121049354@bluelife.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
On 13 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> Hi VirtualBox users.
>=20
> I'm sending this because there are a few problems in how we currently
> maintain the emulators/virtualbox-ose ports on FreeBSD. [etc]
A question: woud there be any advantage in separating out the kernel =
module from the rest of it? Just asking, because I have no idea about =
the stability of the components and interfaces.
--
Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243
rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 940 1295
mobile +44 (0)783 626 4518
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3095B667-A2DD-40A6-95FE-0A59DEF853CF>