From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 01:15:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A551D37B401 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 01:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ADC43FAF for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 01:15:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4436B2A7EA for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 01:15:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1011088334329.1011074844992.200317@scheduler> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 01:15:58 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030401091558.4436B2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> Subject: Re: Fat Cat Media Newsletter X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:15:58 -0000 Sorry, this one slipped through. I had just reset the spamassassin bayesian filter because of a rather silly thing that I did that poisoned the database. (hint: dont whitelist your mailing list sender address, that causes most spam to be scored as about -90 or so and autolearned as ham) Its interesting to see the mime stripping at work though. This had fairly nasty tracking and javascript in the original email. Unfortunately the stripping makes downstream spamassassins even less interested. Mine at home rated the "cleaned" version at 0.5 :-(. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5