Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:30:29 +0200 From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: better way to handle required rebuild on library bump Message-ID: <a0777e081002070530o33df85c6pcf36aa2468245210@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100207065644.747507f6@scorpio.seibercom.net> References: <a0777e081002061348w2df8927brcc247ce0e3fdf5c7@mail.gmail.com> <20100207065644.747507f6@scorpio.seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This will accomplish exactly what you want: > > portmanager -u -p > How will portmanager -u -p avoid the need to bump the PORTREVISION (like the recent jpeg change)? > > It is in the port tree. > > -- > Jerry > gesbbb@yahoo.com > > |::::======= > |::::======= > |=========== > |=========== > | > > We are not a clone. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a0777e081002070530o33df85c6pcf36aa2468245210>