From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 21 12:53:05 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D2B16A41F;
	Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:53:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andrea@acampi.inet.it)
Received: from acampi.inet.it (acampi.inet.it [213.92.1.165])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B5D43D48;
	Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:53:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andrea@acampi.inet.it)
Received: by acampi.inet.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CE2EC31; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:53:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:53:01 +0200
From: Andrea Campi <andrea+freebsd_cvs_all@webcom.it>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <20050921125301.GC28976@webcom.it>
References: <20050921123401.GL34934@fasolt.home.paeps.cx>
	<15195.1127306394@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <15195.1127306394@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Philip Paeps <philip@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:53:05 -0000

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:39:54PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Uhm, you guys should be looking at how nanobsd.sh does things, the old
> Makefile based stuff is going away RSN.

Sure, but since I'm still on 6.0, I wanted to sync up to the latest in
the branch before patching up to HEAD.
Speaking of which, do you think you will merge things soon? It would make
sense to get the new nanobsd.sh in RELENG_6. Would it help if I provided
a tested patch?

Bye,
	Andrea

-- 
                   Press every key to continue.