From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 3 0:53:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from www.kpi.com.au (www.kpi.com.au [203.39.132.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A335237B7AA; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 00:53:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shevlandj@kpi.com.au) Received: from grail (www.kpi.com.au [203.39.132.210]) by www.kpi.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA38844; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:56:42 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from shevlandj@kpi.com.au) From: "Joe Shevland" To: "Kris Kennaway" , "Neil Blakey-Milner" Cc: "Siobhan Patricia Lynch" , "Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai" , "Robert Watson" , , Subject: RE: MFC'ing OpenSSL 0.9.5a? Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 17:56:58 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org That's interesting; I did experience this problem (apols!) but I put it = down to IE's inability to handle 128-bit certificates... when I upgraded = IE using the Mickeysoft update patch everything worked again. Hence I = pointed the finger at IE... perhaps wrongly? Cheers, Joe >-----Original Message----- >From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@hub.freebsd.org] >Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 5:42 PM >To: Neil Blakey-Milner >Cc: Joe Shevland; Siobhan Patricia Lynch; Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai; = Robert >Watson; freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; ogud@tislabs.com >Subject: Re: MFC'ing OpenSSL 0.9.5a? > > >On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > >> On Thu 2000-08-03 (13:15), Joe Shevland wrote: >> > I guess its worth noting that modssl is different to Apache-SSL? = We're >> > using Apache-SSL (1.3.12) and haven't seen any problems at all = (both >> > with 0.9.5a and over the last couple of years, perhaps been lucky = :) >>=20 >> How often do you generate certificates with it? I've had a number of >> complaints about 0.9.5a generating certificates that Internet = Explorer >> just can't comprehend. > >In fact that's precisely the opposite problem we're trying to = investigate >here..I haven't heard that complaint. > >Kris > >-- >In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message