From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 19:47:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3336D16A418; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from frontmail.ipactive.de (frontmail.maindns.de [85.214.95.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001B213C45D; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from mail.vtec.ipme.de (Q7d7c.q.ppp-pool.de [89.53.125.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by frontmail.ipactive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F834128844; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:47:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from cesar.sz.vwsoft.com (cesar.sz.vwsoft.com [192.168.16.3]) by mail.vtec.ipme.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC503F43B; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:45:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47B49AB6.1040609@vwsoft.com> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:47:02 +0100 From: Volker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis References: <47B3E21F.1010202@vwsoft.com> <20080214150200.GB18534@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <47B49023.20204@vwsoft.com> <20080214191737.GA20098@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20080214191737.GA20098@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1203623142.04387@RpwMkqPxnOl7DzS37wt8VQ X-VWSoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com X-ipactive-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ipactive-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ipactive-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: licensing question APSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:47:24 -0000 On 02/14/08 20:17, Brooks Davis wrote: > APSL is not generally accepted in the base. It may be acceptable in > certain circumstances, but strong technical justification is generally > required for inclusion. Brooks, so better put that into the ports tree? Thanks Volker