From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Apr 12 22:21:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat192.236.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.192.236]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A56214CFC for ; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:21:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA55246 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 02:19:28 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 02:19:28 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: SMP under 3.x-STABLE ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm considering upgrading one of my production boxes to a Dual-PII ASUS motherboard ... I want to leave it running 3.x-STABLE, but am curious as to how ppl feel about SMP support in 3.x-STABLE... Basically, is it stable? Or should it be avoided? Thanks... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message