From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Aug 17  2:50: 7 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB7537B400
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BED643E4A
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7H9o4JU098685
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7H9o4oh098684;
	Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200208170950.g7H9o4oh098684@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: =?koi8-r?B?+8HQz9vOycvP1yDhLuEu?= <saa@adm.bal.ru>
Subject: Re: misc/41682: Distinctions of Windows Sockets and FreeBSD Sockets
Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?+8HQz9vOycvP1yDhLuEu?= <saa@adm.bal.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR misc/41682; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?koi8-r?B?+8HQz9vOycvP1yDhLuEu?= <saa@adm.bal.ru>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, saa@adm.bal.ru
Cc:  
Subject: Re: misc/41682: Distinctions of Windows Sockets and FreeBSD Sockets
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:20:10 +0400

 Hello, freebsd-gnats-submit.
 
 My trouble misc/41682 is partially solved. Sorry for disturbing you.
 The problem by all was in a difference temporary delays between Windows
 and *Nix in speed of access to sockets. Simply at *nIX it in times more faster.
 Not absolutely in it is sure, but it seems so.
 
 Sorry for mistakes.
 -- 
 With Best regards,
  Alexander                          mailto:saa@adm.bal.ru
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message