From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 07:29:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB1216A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:29:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14DEC43D39 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:29:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.27.163 with login) by smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2005 07:29:52 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:29:51 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <41F59C8B.1060308@fusemail.com> <1106633271l.27041l.1l@BARTON> In-Reply-To: <1106633271l.27041l.1l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501242329.52085.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: Jason Henson Subject: Re: which bittorrent client X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:29:52 -0000 On Monday 24 January 2005 10:07 pm, Jason Henson wrote: > On 01/24/05 20:10:35, Brian John wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like some advice on which Bittorrent client to use. I > > really like Azureus, but I always get OutOfMemoryException's and it > > takes up like 300 MB of memory sometimes. Is there a more > > lightweight client that has the main features of Azureus > > (priorities, auto-resuming)? What does everyone on this list use? > > > > Thanks! > > py24-BitTorrent-devel-3.9.0_4,1 Is what I have. seems to work fine > for me. I highly recommend ctorrent, a client written entirely in C. It's very fast, small and efficient. It's quite basic - you have to run a separate process for each torrent - but you can call it from something else to further customize it. It doesn't do priorities as such (not exactly - you can set max, min peers, rate, etc., for each torrent) or auto-resume, but this could be set fairly easily by writing it into a script. The best thing is that it just works, and as efficiently as possible. - jt