From owner-cvs-all Thu Aug 23 2:49:39 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5C437B401; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 02:49:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f7N9nLX06093; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:49:21 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:49:19 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules Message-ID: <20010823134919.B5992@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200108230913.f7N9Dk525008@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:36:30 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > > Log: > > Remove non-existen kernfs > > Why do you do that? It's not "non-existent", it's just been removed > from -CURRENT. I believe we have a stated policy of not removing > CVSROOT/modules entries for code that still exists on older branches. I doubt we can keep 'modules' useful for non-current too, just consider movings like many things from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. Current module names in that case are unusable for non-current. Or do you mean it must be semi-usable excepting movings? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message