From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 21 23:37:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA19996 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 23:37:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from mybsd.mybsd.net (citytelprct48.citytel.net [204.244.99.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA19990 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 23:37:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kwoody@citytel.net) Received: from mybsd.net (mybsd.net [192.168.0.2]) by mybsd.mybsd.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA20868; Fri, 21 Nov 1997 23:35:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 23:35:14 -0800 (PST) From: Kwoody X-Sender: kwoody@mybsd.net To: Shawn Ramsey cc: "Bond, Jeffery" , "'questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Is NE2000 network card OK? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Yeah it does... I have gotten transfews that FTP claims was around 1MB per > second. Thats pretty good considering the theoretical maximum is only > 1.25MB per second. This was on a very low traffic 10BaseT connected only > via a HUB, From a FreeBSD box to an NTW box. ftp from my 95 box to freebsd 2.1.7 claims 531.52 Kbytes/sec on Netscape 3.01 source tarball at 2567262 bytes. 4.83 secs to transfer. This is a coax connected lan. certainly not 1MB/sec here. Oh well...!