From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 26 06:02:11 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id GAA20898 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 06:02:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from kaori.communique.net (kaori.Communique.Net [204.27.65.55]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id GAA20893 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 06:02:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by kaori.communique.net with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.837.3) id <01BBF302.C20B1150@kaori.communique.net>; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 07:59:45 -0600 Message-ID: From: Raul Zighelboim To: "'proff@suburbia.net'" Cc: "'hackers@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: RE: Help 'no buffer available'!! Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 07:59:44 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.837.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As I have seen the server die no long after this messages pop up, I am glad I am receiving them :-) or :-( >> >> ----kiyoko:/var/log# ping akira >> PING akira.communique.net (204.27.65.10): 56 data bytes >> 64 bytes from 204.27.65.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.867 ms >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available >> ping: wrote akira.communique.net 64 chars, ret=-1 >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available > >I often get this as well. What is the philosophy in having >sendto() et al return an error, rather than block until >buffer space is available? > >