From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 15 15:46:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA06375 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:46:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA06241 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:45:51 GMT (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from tdx.co.uk (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA09163; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:45:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Message-ID: <35353888.D6E02D6A@tdx.co.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:45:28 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz Organization: TDX X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Huey CC: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: root filesystem on an array? References: <3535371F.B8B5EABA@epigram.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I would have thought - that so long as the array is done in hardware, and has a suitable number of drives in it - then the usual RAID 5 rules apply, i.e. you take a 'nasty' hit on writes (when compared to reads) - but _overall_ the array is usually faster... ;-) I don't think putting the 'root' filesystem on it (if supported) would be any better / worse than other filesystems (e.g. /usr etc.) - and if I was given the choice (i.e. had the hardware) it would be there allready... (i.e. go for the redundancy... Afterall - the root FS is pretty important... ;-) Regards, Karl Pielorz Brandon Huey wrote: > > what performance issues are there when the root filesystem in on a > RAID-5 array? > i'm mainly wondering if there are performance hits big enough to lessen > the benefit of redundancy. > > thanks, > -bh > > > > -- > > Brandon Huey Epigram, Inc. > bh@epigram.com +1 408 720 3027 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message