Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:57:38 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: X + WM != GUI? (Re: Convince me, please! - too much about "GUI") Message-ID: <46bc2882.TI%2BZ9rtlEFmBGJQV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <20070809185814.D71656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <46BA9682.7020203@ix.netcom.com> <20070809082612.b990026e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070809151022.Y69393@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200708091459.l79ExbIU016932@smtpclu-5.eunet.yu> <20070809185814.D71656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text > and graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config, > there are plenty of nice other wm's good for that. I am not following this. If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI, how would you define * a GUI * X.org + some WM
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46bc2882.TI%2BZ9rtlEFmBGJQV%perryh>