Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:08:39 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 235031] [em] em0: poor NFS performance, strange behavior
Message-ID:  <bug-235031-7501-V0SvIsK1mp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-235031-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-235031-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235031

--- Comment #40 from Marko Cupa=C4=87 <marko.cupac@mimar.rs> ---
Hi,

I just got advice to try and disable LRO on em0 interface with base driver,=
 and
it resulted in acceptable performance in my VirtualBox VMs with bridged
networking.

I noticed different options between the two drivers:

if_em:
options=3D81249b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LRO,WOL_=
MAGIC,VLAN_HWFILTER>

if_em_updated:=20
options=3D4219b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_=
MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO>

The difference is that if_em_updated has TSO4 and not LRO, also VLAN_HWTSO =
and
not VLAN_HWFILTER

I am back to if_em_updated for now, but hopefully this information will be
helpful in fixing if_em.

Regards,

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-235031-7501-V0SvIsK1mp>