From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 00:07:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77D316A403 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rik_davis2004@yahoo.com) Received: from web58305.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58305.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FFE543D5C for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik_davis2004@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 86185 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Oct 2006 00:07:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=C/y7g8JofnYpipHgvOlWNk5MecS0dUg3xFsm1ILjkEito8XapORgdfLmZx4uCi3Uh08DOVlUJeAtLd20o79LQXMosNrWD0ooa0mDEsnWoDbl7QIRW6Y1pi5+2q/XYALUclk+t7bTyEizCK8qv0W4eAmDICk2N9v7Ry7LBFWdouc= ; Message-ID: <20061027000754.86183.qmail@web58305.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.91.188.92] by web58305.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:07:54 PDT Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:07:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Rik Davis To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 03:20:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Ports collection issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:07:56 -0000 Guys, I'm a die hard freebsd user, but I am finding myself becomeing quite frustrated with why you completely pulled the 5.4 ports collection off of your ftp sites. When I try to use my /stand/sysinstall now and attempt to connect to you ftp server, I ge the error that it cannot locate the 5.4-RELEASE packages. Why would you remove a collection that is still in such high demand by those of us that have yet to upgrade our binaries to a later version? I depend on that being there, but this is not leaving a very pleasant taste in my mouth. Also, this is not the first time I have seen you do this. What am I supposed to do now that I no longer have access to those packages? Sincerely, Adrian Brooks --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.