Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:13:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196432] Allow @sample keyword reference a symlink Message-ID: <bug-196432-13-EJecRwQ93y@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-196432-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-196432-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196432 Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Status|New |Closed --- Comment #8 from Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net> --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #7) > I still don't like it, I find it way better to install the target of the > symlink so that it can be modified than copying the symlink which, if > modified, will be overwritten on next upgrade. Indeed, firing up a text editor on /etc/ssl/cert.pem would try to alter contents of symlink destination. It wasn't very clear in comment 1 what sample symlink content mean, the link with .sample suffix stripped or its destination. @sample in bug 196431 should work fine without the patch here. It'd install 3 copies of the same sample file but user can make one main and the rest point to it (e.g. bug 196435). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196432-13-EJecRwQ93y>