From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 13 22:12:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3794158 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chthonixia.net) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794E0175 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (unknown [184.152.30.105]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAEAF2E2BD; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:12:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:12:47 -0500 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: Regarding: Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Message-ID: <20130113221247.GA40399@whisperer.chthonixia.net> References: <20130113020114.GA23658@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <20130113052123.GA38280@whisperer.chthonixia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:12:05 -0000 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:34:30AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Hi, > > Yeah i think it just sends through sendmail on the local machine. You may > find it convenient to use the web interface. Your config.log says you are > running FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Oct 22 00:16:27 EDT 2012, you should > consider upgrading to 9.1, which was released in December. My very, very, bad mistake: I forget to mention in this email thread my current uname -a, which is in the send-pr that was rejected: FreeBSD whisperer.chthonixia.net 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r245243: Wed Jan 9 18:25:14 EST 2013 root@whisperer.chthonixia.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WHISPERER amd64 Since I did not think the bug would be addressed via this thread, I'm really sorry to have wasted your time; I should have thought to submit another PR via the web interface with my current environment. I can do that that so a proper bug report is opened unless you think it unnecessary. Best regards, Joe