From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 1 07:14:22 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA13781 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 07:14:22 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA13772 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 07:14:11 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA06509 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sat, 1 Apr 1995 08:51:29 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA01459; 1 Apr 95 08:50:37 CST (Sat) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id IAA01456; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 08:50:37 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199504011450.IAA01456@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: symlink mode_t question To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Sat, 1 Apr 1995 08:50:36 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu In-Reply-To: <199503311629.CAA04990@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Apr 1, 95 02:29:40 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 386 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >I'm adding a symlink option to install(1), and I would like the > >symlink access permissions to reflect those of the original file. > They can't in general in FreeBSD-2.0. Symlinks have the same > attributes as their parent directory. Wasn't this going to be changed, because it's only there to conform to some posix recommendation for the case where symlinks aren't in inodes?