Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:08:18 +0200
From:      "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de>
To:        Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net>
Cc:        tg@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] port: python-2.1.2 -> 2.1.3
Message-ID:  <20020410180818.E79746@mail.webmonster.de>
In-Reply-To: <200204101153.04522.alane@geeksrus.net>; from alane@geeksrus.net on Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:53:04AM -0400
References:  <20020409194743.A42693@mail.webmonster.de> <20020410165222.B79746@mail.webmonster.de> <200204101153.04522.alane@geeksrus.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alan E(alane@geeksrus.net)@2002.04.10 11:53:04 +0000:
> On Wednesday 10 April 2002 10:52, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> > in followup to my last mail including the make changes as files, here is
> > a patch against the ports tree as of today, 15:40 CEST. it applies from
> > /usr/ports and updates bsd.python.mk, python21 and py-tkinter to the
> > 2.1.3 python bugfix version.
>=20
> FYI I have an open PR (36353) against Python 2.1, and whichever patch goe=
s in=20
> first will invalidate the other (for Makefile only). It's not a big deal =
(my=20
> patch bumps PORTREVISION, you bump PORTVERSION).=20

this should be resolved first, then. it is just a "works for me[tm]"
fix, since i am neither a make or ports subsystem guru. since zope had
severe problems on my freebsd box i needed to fire up py2.1.3 very
quick. i don't want to have zope going down 8 times a day on a
production system.

the main question here is that the portversion should then say "2.1" and
the revision should be set to 2.1.2/2.1.3, respectively. right?
(in terms of "major release" vs. "maintenance/bugfix release")
we are tackling different problems here.

btw, what about having a post-install telling the user to ln -s his
preferred version of python in /usr/local/bin on his own? i think this
would make sense, because it's quite dangerous if /usr/local/bin/python
gets replaced automagically.

regards,
/k

--=20
> Microsoft: Where do you want to go today?
> Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?
> FreeBSD: Are you guys coming or what?
> http://www.freebsd.org - The power to serve!
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n=
et/
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 B=
F46
My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/
Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1=
0x

--cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8tGNyM0BPTilkv0YRAmX9AKCMEP4qPSnjZIusMQW9bUBTXwlaSwCgt8tM
tXUH8APHiwIY4pvcGQMcKQg=
=05LB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cz6wLo+OExbGG7q/--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020410180818.E79746>