From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Oct 22 22:40: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E10B37B65F for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA11117; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010230540.WAA11117@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: bin/22210: typeof(passwd->pw_gid) != typeof(group->gr_gid) Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/22210; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Garrett Wollman Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/22210: typeof(passwd->pw_gid) != typeof(group->gr_gid) Date: 23 Oct 2000 07:35:53 +0200 Garrett Wollman writes: > < said: > > > the type of the gr_gid member of struct group doesn't match > > the type of the pw_gid member of struct passwd which prevent > > a simple comparison such as passwd->pw_gid == group->gr_gid > > w/o a compiler warning. > > This will be fixed in my giant POSIX-draft header patch which will hit > the tree some time next month. do you think that FreeBSD will be POSIX compliant in the sense of the OpenGroup one day ? what I would like to say is, is it possible to make FreeBSD pass the OpenGroup validation tests ? is this a cost problem (I guess yes) ? Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message