From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Jun 13 17:39:11 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A088102126E; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:39:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CFE6FB29; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w5DHd6Ms040723; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w5DHd6sl040722; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201806131739.w5DHd6sl040722@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Armeb removal before 12 In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT) CC: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:39:11 -0000 > I'd like to remove armeb before 12.0. > > It's poorly supported today. > > Nobody has tested the concurrency kit changes on it. And ck is now > mandatory. We don't even know if it works or not. > > Last time we asked, it took quite a while to find users. > > It maxes out at 256MB of RAM. This is barely large enough for FreeBSD to > run in. 64MB is usable for 32 bit archs, I have many VM's running in that configuration, so this item should not be in this list. > > The hardware was last made almost a decade ago. > > It uses non-standard non-mainstream boot loaders (boot technology has moved > on from redboot). > > The cost of doing API sweeps, make universe runs, etc exceeds the benefit > to the project. > > So, given all these factors, it sounds like a good candidate for retirement. > > Therefore, I'd like to remove it on July 15th. > > Comments? (please keep them on topic to this specific thing: there's other > things that may also be past their freshness date, we'll discuss those in a > separate thread). Given all the other valid reasons, I have no objection to removal of armeb. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org