Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 20:03:12 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: black@zen.cypher.net (Ben Black), kory@avatar.com, brownie@earthling.net, csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? Message-ID: <291.862250592@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 1997 10:17:05 PDT." <199704281717.KAA02093@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199704281717.KAA02093@phaeton.artisoft.com>, Terry Lambert writes: >The PPro's are stackable without additional electronics external >to the processor. This makes it a *lot* easier to do multiple >CPU's up to large numbers. The original design was for up to four PP's to be stackable. Unfortunately it transpired to not be the case (for reasons for signal integrity I belive, and therefore 4*PP cards have a number of buffers more than 2*PP cards. >My goal would be to have incremental compiles going on in edit sessions >so that when I was done editing, the code was read to run. I hate this >"wait for the compile" BS. Ever seen or heard about the TeX WYSIWYG computer built with InMos transputers ? :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?291.862250592>