From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 22 00:59:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0267416A408 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CB113C4BF for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19C01A4D8F; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C84E2515E6; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:59:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:59:39 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeffrey Goldberg Message-ID: <20070322005939.GA61420@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <0EE4A357-FB1C-410D-BDF2-AF3A8BC7736B@goldmark.org> <20070319143905.7c69cc41@gumby.homeunix.com> <823E470A-93A8-4B6B-899A-E337FB75CABD@goldmark.org> <20070321225011.GA60066@xor.obsecurity.org> <9F2002A1-C336-48D0-A9BA-B43A3E80ABAD@goldmark.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9F2002A1-C336-48D0-A9BA-B43A3E80ABAD@goldmark.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Summary: Tell portupgrade to use passive ftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:59:41 -0000 On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:52:51PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > On Mar 21, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:29:03PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > > > >> > >> As far as I can tell this and many other configuration options > >>are not > >> documented anywhere outside of the .mk files themselves. Is that > >>really how > >> things should be? > >> > > >Let me tell you a totally awesome secret: YOU HAVE THE POWER TO CHANGE > >THIS! :-D omg > > Yes, I know. But I should never be trusted to organize a project, > and this is far too much for one person: > > $ cd /usr/ports/Mk > $ sed -n 's/^ *\([a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)?\{0,1\}=.*$/\1/p' *.mk | sort | uniq > | wc -l > 1593 > > If someone else is coordinating a project to document all of those, > I'd be happy to contribute. Why do you think it needs to be solved all at once? Nothing ever gets done that way. You have learned something that you say is not documented, so the solution is for you to document it. Go on, pull out your favourite editor, edit the ports(7) manpage, then send-pr the diff. I dare you :) Kris