From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 01:54:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB7B106566B; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1425A8FC13; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xyf.my.dom (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9S1s2tD064930; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:54:02 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4CC9483C.7050507@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:54:04 +0000 From: David Xu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100630) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <201010270232.o9R2Wsu3084553@svn.freebsd.org> <4CC803A8.3040602@freebsd.org> <20101027082122.GD1848@garage.freebsd.pl> <4CC85552.2020100@freebsd.org> <20101027133307.GQ2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4CC851CC.80509@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Kostik Belousov Subject: Re: svn commit: r214409 - head/sys/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:54:05 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> [patch attachment was lost] > > Ugh... Mailman hates me I guess :(... > >> on 27/10/2010 19:07 Garrett Cooper said the following: >>> How about this patch? I implemented this as a readonly tunable and >> I don't think that it's correct to call it a tunable or use CTLFLAG_RDTUN. >> As I understand it is a read-only sysctl. > > Converted to CTLFLAG_RD. > >>> sysconf tunable, because (AFAIK) the value that is being tested >>> shouldn't change during runtime after the system has been booted up, >>> and figuring that the value wasn't going to change it was better to >>> lose 4/8 bytes on the kernel stack instead of having to recompute the >>> value every time in a function call, with the associated lost heap / >>> stack memory in the process, as the assumption is that this libcall >>> was going to be called frequently by some programs. > > Thanks! > -Garrett > The patch looks fine to me. ;-)