From owner-freebsd-arch  Wed May 24 19:29:13 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (berserker.twistedbit.com [199.79.183.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E8FC837B83B; Wed, 24 May 2000 19:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cp@berserker.bsdi.com)
Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (cp@[127.0.0.1])
	by berserker.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16470;
	Wed, 24 May 2000 20:29:09 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200005250229.UAA16470@berserker.bsdi.com>
To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Preemptive kernel on older X86 hardware 
From: Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 20:29:09 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

}> 
}> I expect that they are inlined.
}
}This would actually be a fairly Bad Thing on at least some platforms.  
}Maybe we should consider whether they should be inlined on some and 
}function calls on others (where there might be separate implementations).

	BSD/OS inlines for sparc on Intel, but this is MD code so
you can do as you will.

Chuck



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message