From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 30 22:52:23 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083A7B71
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:52:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from dt71@gmx.com)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96AC72A32
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [157.181.98.186] ([157.181.98.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMGWH-1VaHZL3VJV-0082Nm for
 <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:52:14 +0100
Message-ID: <52718D7F.5030704@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:51:43 +0100
From: dt71@gmx.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sbruno@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: libreadline rl_message() and building the same object file 6
 times?
References: <1383079869.59169.2.camel@localhost>
 <20131029220622.GX59496@kib.kiev.ua> <1383157189.1751.6.camel@localhost>
 <20131030202439.GD59496@kib.kiev.ua> <1383171248.1751.8.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1383171248.1751.8.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mjT1YO/GnS8UaPcT1dx2ST32iPLLq/6tkwa4Ug9okhLbrI2W+1+
 xbKTJ+yuEKtqeT44kz8wxkT7bp6UJzB+wKy8rUlAyjiqLH7foa8CCvOTny+uJ+cwoUfdLgz
 uu9k7mNnUO69TNRxDs4RPMaMNrgH6pBL7XPISgbfwU5gtzwbdSMJdMJX7iugxQKiTRK/I6U
 feIrJ/4fsIi4JlUuBtIpQ==
Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:52:23 -0000

Sean Bruno wrote, On 10/30/2013 23:14:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 22:24 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> Thank you for the explanation.  Is there a trivial way to abort
>> building
>>> all the objects or fail if one fails?  Or is this done in parallel?
>>
>> This is done automatically, no ?
>> Bmake seems to be more advanced in this regard, e.g. my parallel
>> kernel builds with compilation error in some module abort whole build
>> immediately, comparing with fmake builds which run to the end.
>
> Yes, the build exits immediately if I understand what's going on
> correctly.  My question was about building all six objects, shouldn't
> one error/warning be enough?  Or is there no way for what I propose to
> happen?

What if one path takes very long, for example, if it's an independent call to make(1)?