From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 21 12:57:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07BE16A41F;
	Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:57:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9266B43D45;
	Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:57:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD8ABC66;
	Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:57:22 +0000 (UTC)
To: Andrea Campi <andrea+freebsd_cvs_all@webcom.it>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:53:01 +0200."
	<20050921125301.GC28976@webcom.it> 
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:57:21 +0200
Message-ID: <15271.1127307441@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Philip Paeps <philip@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:57:24 -0000

In message <20050921125301.GC28976@webcom.it>, Andrea Campi writes:
>On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:39:54PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> Uhm, you guys should be looking at how nanobsd.sh does things, the old
>> Makefile based stuff is going away RSN.
>
>Sure, but since I'm still on 6.0, I wanted to sync up to the latest in
>the branch before patching up to HEAD.
>Speaking of which, do you think you will merge things soon? It would make
>sense to get the new nanobsd.sh in RELENG_6. Would it help if I provided
>a tested patch?

I hope to get the new nanobsd.sh into RELENG_6 before 6.0 comes out,
but since it lives in src/tools/tools it is a lot less critical and
therefore a bit low on my priority list.

Patches are always welcome :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.