From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Jul  3 08:23:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA14893
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 08:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA14888
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 08:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1)
	id 0wjnfG-0001Br-00; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 09:19:22 -0600
To: "Sergei S. Laskavy" <laskavy@cs.msu.su>
Subject: Re: Why perl is still setuid? 
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 03 Jul 1997 15:11:19 +0400."
		<199707031111.PAA01774@ns.cs.msu.su> 
References: <199707031111.PAA01774@ns.cs.msu.su>  
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 1997 09:19:22 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0wjnfG-0001Br-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199707031111.PAA01774@ns.cs.msu.su> "Sergei S. Laskavy" writes:
: What do you think about buffer overflows in Perl 4.x and 5.x ?

I think they are fixed.  Prove me wrong :-)

Warner