From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Apr 27 22:55:08 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA29878
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 27 Apr 1995 22:55:08 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA29871
          for <ports@freefall.cdrom.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 1995 22:55:05 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA15318; Thu, 27 Apr 1995 22:53:09 -0700
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 1995 22:53:09 -0700
Message-Id: <199504280553.WAA15318@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: nils@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de
CC: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr, jkh@time.cdrom.com, jmacd@FreeBSD.org,
        ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <m0s4Uuk-0003VaC@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de> (nils@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de)
Subject: Re: g77 port
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I know this, I don't like it either. But: both gnat and g77 are 
 * integral parts of the gcc compiler and gcc's standard searchpath for
 * compiler backends is /usr/libexec. Hence I decided to put gnat1 and
 * f771 there or at least install a symlink there pointing to the real
 * places. Installing the ports in a separate hierarchy like /usr/local

Oh, okay.  I don't think there will be any problem if we add a tiny
little symlink or two in /usr/libexec.  I'll add it as part of the
post-install target.

Satoshi