From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Dec 19 5:30: 0 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 05:29:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AC137B698 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 05:29:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97E5A2876A; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:29:52 +0600 (ALMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E294285D2; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:29:52 +0600 (ALMT) Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:29:52 +0600 (ALMT) From: Boris Popov To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: retiring kernfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 13 Dec 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Any serious objections to retiring the (long obsolete) kernfs > pseudo-file system? (I'll count any "kernfs? what's that?" replies as > "no, go ahead and remove it") Yes, it is not maintained for ages and have a very little of useful information. However, some setups here use sysctlfs instead to access kernel information. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message