From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 10:17:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F36106564A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de) Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [213.83.63.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA108FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQFcw-0002xf-7M for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Subject: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:49 -0000 Hello, Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports and later do the updating just with: # cd /usr/ports # cvs update # portupgrade -ai The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommends?) using 'csup' for updating ports tree... What is the advantage (or reason, if any)? Thanks in advance matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/