From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri May  1 21:38:26 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA03996
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 1 May 1998 21:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03963
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 1 May 1998 21:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA01761;
	Fri, 1 May 1998 21:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@coe.ufrj.br>
cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bug at -stable DEVFS support ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 02 May 1998 00:16:53 -0300."
             <199805020316.AAA01302@roma.coe.ufrj.br> 
Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 21:37:53 -0700
Message-ID: <1757.894083873@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Wait, you did say *-stable* DEVFS?

AFAIK, DEVFS in -stable is dead and should probably be just removed
entirely.  All the active DEVFS work is happening in 3.0 and
certainly, to my knowledge at least, there are no plans to ever deploy
DEVFS functionality in the 2.2-stable branch.  The 2.2 branch will
probably be _dead_ before DEVFS is even ready to deploy in production
environments. :)

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message