From owner-cvs-all Sun Apr 7 8: 8: 9 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913B37B405; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 08:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g37F84B80144; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 17:08:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 17:08:04 +0200 From: Cejka Rudolf To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/colldef cs_CZ.ISO8859-2.src Message-ID: <20020407170804.A79700@fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ache@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 06:52:11PM -0800 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrey A. Chernov wrote (2002/04/06): > Modified files: > share/colldef cs_CZ.ISO8859-2.src > Log: > Fix this table, it was completely out of reasonable order No, you completely broke this table. Please, what does this mean? It is completely out of reasonable order now. Before, it was very close to our national collation norm and this norm is still mentioned at the beginning of the file - CSN 97 6030. If you could not believe in it, please look at collation table in Linux - they have this table similar. Why we could not have sorting in FreeBSD close to our norms? Why we have to have such broken sorting? Why you did not contact me before performing this change? -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message