Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 13:37:45 -0400 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <27f46bc2-54f8-f5aa-79ca-184e86d185d8@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <202303221710.32MHAhe9047582@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <202303221710.32MHAhe9047582@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/22/23 13:10, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > [...] > I dont even try ULE any more. I just used 4BSD, as did bde@freebsd.org, > ULE seems to suck when your have interactive use and compute bound on > the same box. I have seen interactive in the past take seconds to > echo a command. IIRC ULE and zfs in a memory contrained environment > dont play nicely togeather either. > > +1 on the return to 4BSD as the default scheduler > Thanks for the support and confirming I am not crazy! -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27f46bc2-54f8-f5aa-79ca-184e86d185d8>