From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 4 01:52:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537B416A412; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EF543D45; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:52:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA41piiB038287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:51:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:51:36 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: "Bruce A. Mah" Message-Id: <20061103205136.57116b6f.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <454BD646.8060904@freebsd.org> References: <454A9A72.4050005@freebsd.org> <20061102214151.273c4ef8.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <454AB4ED.4090109@freebsd.org> <20061103054309.3074eb94.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20061103193441.GB1435@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> <454BA92F.80100@freebsd.org> <20061103221408.GA4361@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> <454BD646.8060904@freebsd.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, sziszi@bsd.hu Subject: Re: Install docs oddity X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:52:15 -0000 On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:52:38 -0800 "Bruce A. Mah" wrote: > If memory serves me right, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:40:15PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > >> I'm glad someone else besides me has seen this. > >> > >> I noticed this on my 1GHz P-III. :-p > > > > My machine was a PII-233 at the time, so the effects were even more > > obvious. :-) > > > >> Did you take a look at my patch? I don't get rid of the loop in > >> doc.subdir.mk, but I make it not get get invoked by the install target. > >> I think this should leave package building unaffected but I confess to > >> not having tested this. > > > > Yes, I did look at it and it seems to be good. The package building > > needs to be tested however, so perhaps I will take a crack at it > > tomorrow (I have a much faster machine now, whoooho! :-) but I have > > never built the packages before so I will need to figure out how to do > > it. > > I kind-of tested package building with the built-up doc tree I had > ("make package" and "make package FORMATS=pdf"). It seemed to behave > correctly but I don't have a lot of familiarity with the doc packages. > > I look forward to hearing your testing results. > > Thanks! And please test the double definition issue if you can. Thanks! -- Tom Rhodes