From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 14:46:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4866716A41F for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:46:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E99143D48 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:46:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:46:03 +0200 id 00000024.42F61EAB.00000827 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:46:03 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20050807144603.GA2057@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050807145633.281d0f39.dick@nagual.st> <42F61CF3.1070001@cs.tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42F61CF3.1070001@cs.tu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: 5.4 <-> 4.11-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:46:05 -0000 On 07 Aug Björn König wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > >I have a 24/7 server running FreeBSD-4.11-stable. > In case you mean the other term of stable: 5.x has been declared > -STABLE one year ago. I know that and of course will bad hard-/software destabalize a system. But what I ment of course was the 24 hours a day usage! Are there caveats to that with 5.4? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja