From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 24 11:16:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D34B16A468 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B07013C448 for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HrBIV-0003jc-PN; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:15:59 +0200 Message-ID: <465573EF.50402@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:15:59 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <46529E35.7080401@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20070523031505.3071bc9b@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4653F303.2000302@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20070524002531.3cd65668@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070524002531.3cd65668@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmanager -s" deletes ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:16:03 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:53:39 +0200 > Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >> This is weird! A program that is supposed to show the *status* of >> installed ports should never arbitrarily *remove* ports. > > I agree that is not clear why it is removing ports without warning. > >> I consider this >> a severe bug. Luckily, this was on a server system where X11 is not >> crucial. I really don't want to imagine the hassle i would have had if >> portmanager had removed exim or apache or samba or ... > > I think the chances of that ever happening are pretty low - do you think any of > them would get removed from ports? The fact that xorg-manpages was being > orphaned is clearly documented in kris@ entry in ports/UPDATING. > > the solution is simple, dont use that tool , at least in the form you are using > it. > Program has a bug --> don't use it. Strange logic, but at least easier then filing a bug report ;-) --Heinrich