From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 14 11:12:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD5337B401 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBC843F3F for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:12:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7EIC6AL018779; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:12:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)h7EIBu55018688; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:11:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:11:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Lukas Ertl In-Reply-To: <20030814190824.P744@leelou.in.tern> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ffsinfo missing in 5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:12:37 -0000 On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > > The only problem with this patch is that we lose the ability to do the > > "START BLOCK SUMMARY AND POSITION TABLE" display for UFS1. I'm not sure > > this is a big issue; I will go ahead and commit it with those #ifdef'd > > out (rather than removed as is the case in the patch) and look for advice > > on reintroducing them from someone with more UFS expertise than me. > > I'll have a look at it once it's back in the tree, maybe I find out what > to do about it. It's in my commit queue for today, so hopefully that opportunity will come quickly :-). I haven't managed to track down much about cg_blks() yet -- it disappeared with UFS2 coming in, so it will probably just take checking out an older tree and pushing it forward again for UFS1 dumping. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories