From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jul 27 21:46:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA27400
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 21:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.my.domain (root@morrison-c07.aa.net [204.157.220.139])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA27394
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 21:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (smpatel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA00778; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 21:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 21:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sujal Patel <smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu>
X-Sender: smpatel@localhost
To: tam@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SMC EtherEZ ISA or SMC Ultra 16
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960726151844.20030A-100000@sabine>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960727214447.179A-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, Tam Weng Seng wrote:

> EtherEZ is supported by FreeBSD ??? I was also wandering whether
> it would be better to get the SMC Ultra 16 or the EtherEZ ??? Or
> maybe a totally different card ???

The SMC EtherEZ is an excellent card IMO.  I have no problems with it in
FreeBSD.


Sujal