From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 26 15:56:43 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DBF106564A
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:56:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.213.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C598FC12
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:56:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so5624889ywp.13
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=5zWjoyFCw+XFdRCaGKKqFm/qJOas+4x2Lkd5VSkYDNQ=;
	b=xpqmhqguOwUIsa8gvzAfHF0m9Dk4whYS9LNUIwFMHHwYwlPaAMrFLSXeP6v46yr4KR
	uYyrEfvV0lUflblZrmbMMeRNkh2lm9Igpqyr9/ixye6G/JIYFQK+CBPEC+2Nn8NEPho4
	RAKqEAoQUst3nqx8L0d283mFmWvIz2PUxBDBo=
Received: by 10.101.149.20 with SMTP id b20mr5949025ano.87.1317050759201; Mon,
	26 Sep 2011 08:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ivoras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.43.9 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <310097590.20110926191353@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References: <1108033999.20110921224848@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<20110922105105.GA1662@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<j5pun7$hb1$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<310097590.20110926191353@serebryakov.spb.ru>
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:25:19 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lnR-lRQxqAdv6EnsR8Vqfq-6jB0
Message-ID: <CAF-QHFWCkyeEp+X483KEYCQZpX4zLngBPP0O=7giU9O_hn9wOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: lev@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: geom_fox vs geom_multipath?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:56:44 -0000

On 26 September 2011 17:13, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hello, Ivan.
> You wrote 26 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3=
., 17:29:11:
>
>>> The geom_fox class is more of an example GEOM class.
>> Should it be disconnected from the build? I don't think it's ever used
>> in practice...
> =C2=A0And the same question is about geom_aes :)

Yes, both are some of the earliest GEOM modules ever, they should be
clearly marked as examples.

Perhaps after HEAD gets unfrozen.